NEW: (# Failure to Register Technicality
NEW: Failure to Register a Sex Offense???
CAUTION: SORNA EFFECTIVE even if state has not enacted it
Plea Bargains: Santabello v New York
Blog also contains "Unfavorable" and "Informational" decisions and relevant news articles. All can be useful in framing arguments for new court actions. (i.e., avoid pitfalls or inform courts.) Or refuting charges, check facts of cases v yours.
Leagle is our main court decision resource.
Find State decisions by the Federal Circuit a State is in.

CAUTION: Decisions are meant to be educational.
For "Personal Life Decisions" consult with a lawyer.

People v Velasquez

8-9-2011 California:

People v. Velasquez

This is an appeal by the People, after the trial court dismissed a prosecution against defendant and respondent Robert Velasquez for violation of the sex offender registration laws. Rather, the trial court granted specific enforcement of a 1990 plea agreement, finding that the agreement did not require defendant to register as a sex offender.

The People argue that the evidence supporting the trial court's findings was flawed or insufficient, and that its enforcement of the 1990 plea agreement in this proceeding was erroneous. The People further argue that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the instant charge pursuant to Penal Code section 1385.1

We conclude that the trial court's factual finding, that non-registration was an essential term of defendant's 1990 plea agreement, was supported by substantial evidence. We also conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the instant charge. Accordingly, we affirm.

No comments: